Nigeria can’t decide what to do about the rise and rise of cryptocurrency

The Nigerian presidency, central bank, local regulators, and tech community are at odds over “money created out of thin air.”
Image: Collected

When the Central Bank of Nigeria sent out a circular on February 5 warning the public about the dangers and risks of cryptocurrencies, it stirred local banks and the fintech community into a frenzy. In one stroke, the central bank seemed to have barred financial institutions from dealing in or enabling crypto transactions.

“It’s a crazy one,” said Lightson Ogwor, a 25-year-old graphic designer based in Enugu, a city in Nigeria’s southeast. Ogwor, who has been trading cryptocurrencies since 2016, is one of a growing number of tech-savvy young Nigerians who have turned to cryptos in recent years to get around the country’s byzantine forex trading rules and as an investment opportunity. 

Cryptocurrencies have been under increased government scrutiny since last October, when they played a role in supporting the #EndSARS protests against police brutality. The movement was able to sustain itself by taking donations via bitcoin, after the government slapped punitive restrictions on traditional banks. Regulators have also been concerned about a major drop-off in official dollar remittances to Nigeria last year, due in part to Nigerians in the diaspora increasingly using crypto to get around foreign exchange restrictions, after authorities tightened money transfer rules with remittances companies in a bid to buoy the struggling naira. With the naira’s value dropping precipitously over the last decade against the U.S. dollar and other hard currencies, bitcoin has been a useful way to hedge against the multiple exchange rates from the central bank, one set for investors and the much more realistic black market exchange rate.

The early confusion and speculation around its February 5 circular was so intense that the apex bank was forced to issue a five-page press release just two days later. It claimed it had not, in fact, imposed “any new restrictions on cryptocurrencies” because there were already existing restrictions on financial institutions. The central bank also warned about crypto dealings being used in “money laundering, terrorism financing, illicit fund flows and criminal activities” and cited strict cryptocurrency regulations in countries including China, Canada, Indonesia, Bolivia, and Saudi Arabia. 

Cryptocurrency use has soared in popularity in Nigeria in the past couple of years. Nigeria is first in the total volume of bitcoin exchange and transactions on the continent. 

Under its governor, Godwin Emefiele, Nigeria’s central bank is no stranger to making unexpected and sweeping monetary policy decisions, particularly when it comes to backing the naira. Late last month, he doubled down on his hostility to crypto describing it as “money that is created out of thin air.” 

But the next day, Nigeria’s vice president Yemi Osinbajo, who often plays the role as the voice of reason in president Buhari’s administration, called on the CBN and Nigeria’s Securities & Exchange Commission (SEC) to find ways to regulate cryptocurrencies, rather than just prohibiting their use, in order to support growth and innovation. 

“I fully appreciate the position of the central bank, the Securities and Exchange Commission and … the possible abuses of cryptocurrencies,” said Osinbajo, according to a Reuters report. “There’s a role for regulation here and it is the place of our monetary authorities and SEC to provide a robust regulatory regime that addresses these serious concerns.”

The current government has often claimed it sees a digital future for the struggling economy beyond its long-standing over-reliance on oil exports, but draconian regulatory moves give observers pause about the reality.

“We hope the Bank can take its time to study the blockchain landscape and work with ecosystem players to agree a way forward for regulating cryptocurrency activities,” says Ese Oikhala, a consulting associate at SBM Intelligence, a Lagos-based think tank. “An outright ban is not a suitable option and obviously will slow down our prospect of being globally recognized as a digital economy.”

Source: rest of world


Related Articles

Cyber Behavior for Digital Bangladesh

Cyber Behavior for Digital Bangladesh: UN GGE Perspective

Bangladesh sets its vision for “Digital Bangladesh” in 2009. Digital Bangladesh based on four pillars named: Digital Government, Human Resource Development, IT Industry Promotion...
Rezaul Hossin

DIGITAL BANKING-The Way Forward for Bangladesh

Chinese people identified us (Bangladeshi people) as “Manjala” – meaning low and flat land people. This is one of the major benefits of our...

Protecting Secrecy vs Increasing KPI: Cybersecurity Perspective

This pandemic era has rehabilitated us in many ways. From our daily routine to buying habits, from our learnings to our professional life. Only...

Open-source Software: An analysis from security perspective

Since the beginning from the computer software, programmer has been sharing their codes in order to develop software. In recent times, the usage of...
Start-ups these days grow

Startup challenges and how true/relevant are these startup challenges in the context of Bangladesh

Start-ups these days grow so rapidly that it's difficult for them to correct course once they recognize missteps, which is related the topic “how...
Mohammed Anisur Rahman

The Future of Technology Leadership in Banks of Bangladesh

The global pandemic has been a test of the resilience and adaptability and that the task ahead is to make sure those two attributes...